Nirvana: The True Emotions
Antonio Hernández, O.M.D.
a one who can control his anger is like one who can masterfully steer
a chariot pulled by 10,000 elephants," the Buddha said.
of The American Noahide Buddhists "Star Trek" fans, specifically
those fans of Vulcan characters and the Vulcan philosophy, have
available to them a profound, real-world philosophy to which to
turn. It is the philosophy upon which the Vulcan philosophy is based:
the Buddhist concept of "Nirvana".The Buddha deliberately
chose the very specific word "nirvana" as a sort of goal-less
goal. "Nirvana" is Sanskrit for "cooled-off",
meaning food, specifically rice, that has cooled sufficiently to
be eaten. Applied to the human condition, it means one who has achieved
a mastery of the passions.
In short, it means emotional control something sorely lacking in
todays Western society.
Nirvana is misunderstood by Westerners, who often translate this word
as "void" or "no-thing". Nirvana is anything but a
void or no-thing. The great Western philosopher Baruch (Benito) Spinoza
put it more succinctly than anyone else: if one "disowns" ones
"animal passions", which after all do not ideally belong in
a human, one is left with what Spinoza called "the true emotions".
Spinoza asserted that humans, without reason or discipline, will follow
the example of animals- that is, they will live purely by greed, lust,
hatred, anger, jealousy, envy and the like, because they will be living
without self-discipline, self-understanding, and self-mastery. Spinoza
called these destructive feelings "false". He reasoned, quite
dramatically in his Ethics, that a human is well-equipped to accept, comprehend,
and finally discard these "false emotions".
It was Spinozas contention that in eliminating the negative, one
could not but be left with the purely positive. In stating that "love
originating as hatred shall be much stronger than any other", Spinoza
was clarifying his point. Lust would turn into true compassion, hatred
into understanding, envy into happiness at the good fortune of others,
and so on.
This accomplishment is identical to "Nirvana". It was the Buddhas
goal-less goal as much as it was Spinozas. Though the Buddha refused
to preach on the subject of God, because of his humility, he nonetheless
believed that "Nirvana" was, indeed, the Way to God. In the
minds of both of these great philosophers, the human has no such thing
as "natural instinct".
"Such a one who can control his anger is like one who can masterfully
steer a chariot pulled by 10,000 elephants," the Buddha said. The
Buddha felt that this applied to all emotions. He encouraged the practicing
Buddhist to neither like nor dislike, neither hate nor specifically love,
neither plan ahead with deceit nor stand by idly. He discouraged attachments,
that is, preferences, of any type. After a time, such practice would lead
to the "real human that is within".
Spinoza applied this reasoning to the human who seeks a true, pure relationship
with God. Spinozas concept of "Amore Dei Intelectualis",
the intellectual love of God, could be achieved only by one with true
emotions. Only such a one, understanding and controlling himself perfectly,
could understand and truly love God.
Gene Rodenberry does not appear to have intended Spock, or any Vulcans,
to be devoid of emotion. Neither did the Buddha or Spinoza intend for
the truly advanced person to be emotionless. Such a task is impossible.
In fact, one man wrote of a colleague, an engineer, who felt that the
Vulcan ideal of no emotions would serve him well. This man misinterpreted
the intent of Rodenberrys character; within less than a month of
attempting to suppress his emotions, the engineer suffered a complete
In fact, it is the appropriate expression of our feelings that is vital.
The tenor, the quality, the positivity and usefulness of our emotional
expressions and responses- all are an integral part of this discipline.
Naturally we will feel anger at certain times... but how shall we express
it? To what end? It is the same with any of the base emotions.
In her exquisite novel Spocks World, Diane Duane explained
the Vulcan emotion concept beautifully in two words: "passions
mastery"- the same words used by the Buddha and by Spinoza. And incidentally,
words also used by Mr. Spock and his ancestor, Surak.
George Lucas, too, borrowed this ideal state for his "Star Wars"
Jedi Knights and Masters. There is to be "no passion, only peace"
for the Jedi. Having based the Jedi Order on the Buddhist Order, Lucas
seems to have done his homework. In our training, in Buddhist training,
nothing is so important in the beginning, indeed at every stage, as passions
mastery, the government of the emotions.
The Buddha, the original expounder of this philosophy, had in mind the
hope that humans would evolve fully by following this self-disciplined
path. It would never be easy, it would never come automatically, and that
is the pillar of its importance. It is the proper mindfulness of every
second, of every intent, every thought, every deed, every word, that counts
in attaining Nirvana.
Minding ones feelings, governing oneself masterfully, requires an
action known to Buddhism as "Examination of Conscience". The
Buddhist asks, "Why did I lose my temper yesterday? Why couldnt
I have reasoned instead?" Often, the asker of such questions will
be surprised at the answers that are discovered. The Examination of Conscience
is a practice later borrowed by the Roman Catholic Church, as a disciplinary
exercise for priests and laity.
Science Officer Spock fought valiant battles against his base emotional
inclinations, that he might be able to transcend "chaos" (read:
stupidity) through logic. In "Star Trek" it was often emphasized
that a Vulcan losing self-control would be akin to a raging animal. In
"Star Wars", the great Jedi Annakin Skywalker became the evil
Lord Darth Vader, because he was too weak to control his passions. The
men who wrote these characters and stories knew their history all too
The question facing us now, at the dawn of the 21st century, is about
how well we control ourselves. It is a broad question, implying compassion,
altruism, mercy, understanding, forgiveness and forbearance, as compared
to hatred, anger, greed, selfishness, pride, violence, stupidity and discrimination.
Shall we govern our passions, or shall we live as brute beasts?
When we consider our daily lives, moment-to-moment, when we examine our
own consciences, when we gaze into the mirror, what is it we see? Is it
merely the one, the "self" who stares back at us? Or do we see
the entire universe?
Antonio Hernández, O.M.D.
The Little Green Man Gets Dissected
Wars- Attack of the Giggles
In Black Berets
sleek, lean, mean defense machine'
Nation under Scrutiny
Jefferson, for example, wrote a great deal about God, yet he was an atheist.
< Reply to this Article