The International Writers
W. Bush is an oilman. Make no mistake about that. To write or
utter anything about an energy crisis and the President of the
United States and avoid that slice of information is tantamount
to discussing Martin Luther King's contribution to the Civil Rights
movement and fail to make the distinction about his race."
There is no rational adult alive who really thinks there hasn't been some
form of global warming. They know it, believe me. They just don't want
to admit it for various reasons- selfish political nonsense or pride or
some other goofy notion. It's like the whole Adam & Eve thing. No
one really buys the traditional creationist theory as actual truth. They
may want it to be true, they may even need it to be true, but they know,
intellectually, quite obviously, that it isn't. This self-con is also
not unlike the Flat Earth Society. They know the earth is round, but they
choose to believe otherwise. I choose to believe I play centerfield for
the Yankees. The fact remains I do not. But we are not discussing illusionists
or fanatics today, but those who absolutely must accept global warming
as fiction: Oil Companies.
This is why during the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
hearing this past week (revenge of the Democrats!) it has come to light
that big oil lobbyists and henchmen of the Bush Administration -- bankrolled
by and jam-packed with Oil Men - suppressed scientific panic-speak on
the accelerated global warming dangers. And they did so by completely
rejecting, changing, or expunging scientific facts from the record, thereby
keeping the results from mandating any shift in the torrent of cash flow
pouring into their insatiable coffers.
Makes sense to me. Stringent regulations and panic will only decrease
profits. This cannot stand. Decreasing profits to a business tycoon is
tantamount to someone offering to remove your vital organs to help the
neighbor's lawn grow. There really isn't any point in discussing it. Science?
Fuck that. Money beats science every time. These guys would tell you the
sky is chartreuse and Oswald acted alone if it could keep the federal
government off their backs. And ecology? It's voodoo, jack. Ecology is
the study of available resources yet to exploit.
The Oil Men stance: If we have to move heaven and earth to keep the spotted
owl alive, then why can't we do so for us?
Legislation imposing controls on industrial carbon-dioxide emissions is
a death knell to these people. They would sooner sell their children into
slavery than allow that to happen, something Lee Raymond, former chairman
and CEO of Exxon/Mobile suggested to his attorneys in the autumn of 2002.
The whole global warming thing may be a political football to conservative
spokesmen or liberal protestors, and a fun debate at parties, but it is
Armageddon to Oil Men.
Oh, it's big doings. Scientists live for this shit. They love bringing
the doom. More times than not they're off-the-wall, and this is what emboldens
the delusional global warming opposition. Face it, scientists can get
wacky with catastrophe and then nothing comes of it. Sometimes though,
like quite apparently with global warming, they nail it.
Thus, here is the nagging problem for the Oil Men: Scientific theory is
debatable, but scientific fact is not. Evidence also throws a big rusty
wrench into the thing. Global warming used to be theory, now it is fact.
Network news cameras capturing chunks of glaciers splashing into the Artic
Ocean takes all the wind out of the Oil Men sails. So those who once vehemently
denied the existence of global warming now spin the argument to its pertinence,
shifting it from whether there is such a thing and whether it is happening
or not to how bad it will be and how soon it will start to damage our
way of life, and, most importantly for the Oil Men, how much the use of
their product is contributing to it.
The federal government enters here.
Scientists employed by the government, and paid for by the rest of us
who don't happen to own oil concerns, claim that for the past five years
some 435 times, not two dozen or occasionally, but 435 times there was
some form of government interference or "pressure" to back off
the presentation of findings regarding global warming. Of the 1,600 scientists
having anything to do with government work, 308 responded to an independent
survey on the subject of "government censoring of pertinent environmental
Here's the breakdown: Forty-three percent of respondents reported edits
during review of their work that changed the meaning of their findings.
Forty-six percent felt administrative requirements impaired climate-related
work. Sixty-seven percent said the environment for federal government
climate research is worse now than five years ago.
In other words: Scientists say, "Your house is on fire." Government
officials change it to "A slight incendiary incursion of timber particles."
Or "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."
There's pretty much enough evidence here to safely conclude that the Oil
Men of the private sector who put the Oil Men in charge of our government
have been getting their money's worth. Good for them, and for George W.
Bush, but not so much for us.
Why is it good for Bush? Well, for starters our Boy President wouldn't
have been born on third base and thought he hit a triple if not for Daddy's
oil money. He doesn't get a free ride into and through Yale and the National
Guard or own a baseball team or run companies while snorting half his
salary through his nasal passages without it. He damn sure would not have
broken every standing record for campaign coffers without it. And there
is no possible way he could be president without it either.
Look, I know how business works. I know how politics work. It's human
nature under a gargantuan microscope. And it is basic human nature to
mask bad tidings with cuddly images and superstitious ranting. But the
truth still exists. And sometimes the truth is a bummer. It's a bummer
for all of us who like our Hummers and the SUVs. It's a bummer for those
who gain the windfall for the sales and operation of said items. But it
doesn't change the facts and the evidence. Evidence, whether suppressed
or bellowed from the rooftops or slapped together in an Al Gore documentary,
speaks volumes for rising climate changes, damaged ecosystems, fluctuating
ocean current patterns, and a real threat of flooding.
I'm not sure what we're going to do about it. But that discussion only
begins when we rid ourselves of the fantasy. It is the same battle we've
been waging for almost ten years in this space: The Beautiful Lie or the
Apply it here.
© James campion Feb 5th 2007
James Campion on G.W. Bush
For some sad reason only known to the gods of
misfortune, I found myself listening to the "Imus In The Morning"
radio broadcast sometime during the surreally long week of funeral events
surrounding the passing of our 38th president.
Challenge to the 110th Congress
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not
warned from time to time that the people preserve the spirit of resistance?"
James Campion on how Oil Money crushes Global Warning Science
all rights reserved - all comments are the writers' own responsibiltiy
- no liability accepted by hackwriters.com or affiliates.