The International Writers Magazine REVIEW:
Girl With A Pearl Earring
Directed
by Peter Webber
Written by Olivia Hetreed from Tracy Chevalier's novel
Cast:
Colin Firth .... Vermeer
Scarlett Johansson .... Griet
Tom Wilkinson .... Van Ruijven
Judy Parfitt .... Maria Thins
Cillian Murphy .... Pieter
Essie Davis .... Catharina
Joanna Scanlan .... Tanneke |
|
The plot is
in essence about Griet (Johansson) an intelligent peasant girl sent
to live as a maid at the painter Johannes Vermeer (Firth) who eventually
becomes his muse and a model for one of his most treasured works.
Everything they say about this movie is true. Edward Seras cinematography
is very pretty to look at, the music by Alexandre Desplat is captivating,
the sense of period is accurate and Delft in Holland and Luxembourg
(where it was filmed) have never been so captivating. Scarlett Johansson
is beautiful in a strange way and just as in Lost in Translation
we get to stare at her a lot without tiring of it.
The tensions caused by the arrival of this pretty maid in an intense
and crowded painters household ring true. Nevertheless, the heart
of this film is empty. Whether it is caused by Olivia Hetreeds
script or a fault with the original book, but as much of this film is
about two people just staring at each other with little to say, you
find yourself engaging with the texture on the walls and furniture.
(Interesting though they are) Colin Firth, given few lines, scowls a
great deal. Scarlett being a maid has few words to say at all. Perhaps
the only moment of real tension comes when she deliberately moves a
chair that is in the forefront of a painting he is working on and awaits
Vermeer's potentially angry reaction to it. The wife Catharine (Essie
Davis) has the awkward role of a vain woman driven to jealousy by her
husbands obsessions with Griet. She is at least able to express herself,
and the mother -in-law, played with restraint by Judy Parfitt acts as
nice foil here. When Griet has trouble with one the kids, who constantly
spies on her and tries to get her into trouble, it becomes, perhaps,
the most real moments of the film.
However, it took me a long time to adjust to everyone in Holland speaking
with English accents. Yes I would have been happier with a Dutch cast
and sub-titles. Its the same way I cannot accept Peter Pan
being American in P J Hogans version of the story, or Bob Hoskins
playing Nikita Khrushchev in Enemy at the Gates, either way it
was a bridge too far. I know this was an UK based film and Americans
generally wont see anything with sub-titles so I guess its
just my problem.
|
Director
Peter Webber has made a period film before The Double Life
of Franz Schubert and this would have been quite a challenge
given the confinement of filming in such a claustrophobic 17th Century
Dutch home. All this he does well, but I would have liked to have
seen the film open out a little more into the daily life of Delft
and Holland in 1665. We get hints with the bankruptcy of the Vermeer
neighbours and the endless financial problems of the Vermeers
themselves, which leads to them becoming so indebted to Tom Wilkinsons
character Van Ruijven the richest man in town. Tom Wilkinson
clearly relishes his colourful role as the rich man who can have
whatever he wants and he is quite a contrast to Colin Firths
mute Vermeer.
In the end, it is all Tracy Chevaliers speculation and fantasy.
This is a worthy film, prettily shot and acted but fails to engage
the soul. |
©
Sam North Jan 26th 2004
editor@hackwriters.com
More
Reviews
Home
©
Hackwriters 2000-2004
all rights reserved